Directed by Fritz Kiersch. Written by Stephen King (short story) and George Goldsmith (screenplay). Starring Peter Horton (Burt), Linda Hamilton (Vicky), John Fanklin (Isaac), Courtney Gains (Malachai), Robby Kiger (Job).
Bottom line: Wasn't the worst movie of all time but, for a scary movie, it wasn't scary. The graphics didn't age well and the story felt underdeveloped.
1.5/4
This fall, my fiancée is beginning her PhD studies in
Nebraska. I don't know about you, but I didn't know anything about Nebraska
other than it was really flat. As we have spent some time in Pittsburgh (Dark Knight Rises), Rochester (some of The Amazing Spiderman 2) and Chicago
(countless movies), the next question is what movies were filmed in or set in
Nebraska?
After a quick Google search, what do
I find? Children of the Corn (1984), Children of the Corn (2009),
Children of the Corn II: The Final Sacrifice, Children of the Corn IV: The
Gathering, Children of the Corn V: Fields of Terror, Children of the Corn: Revelation
and, don't forget, Children of the Corn 666: Isaac's Return. Children of the
Corn it is!
This is based off a Steven King
short story of the same name. In the fictional town of Gatlin, Nebraska, a
demon known as "He Who Walks Behind The Rows" has taken control of
the town. Using the preacher's son, Isaac (Franklin), as a mouthpiece, the
demon has commanded the ritual sacrifice of anyone over the age of eighteen. In
one mass killing, the adults are purged from the town leaving Isaac and his
strong first in command Malachai (Gains) in charge. We are introduced to a
couple: Vicky (Hamilton) and her boyfriend Burt (Horton). Burt has recently
finished medical school and the two are driving through the Midwest to the
hospital where he is stationed. She wants to get married and he is hesitant. (A
point of contention the movie never addresses). In classic, predictable horror
movie fashion, the two find themselves in Gatlin. Three years have passed since
the children took over the town. They have to fight the children and the demon
for survival.
This is a horror movie,
mind you, and, if you
have read any of my previous reviews, you will know that I hate horror movies.
One horror-movie-defense tactic I have been practicing is to formulate why the
movie would not or could not affect me. Have I built or bought a house that was
built over a Native American burial ground? Nope. Have I murdered anyone or
stolen any cursed icons? Negative. In the case
of Children of the Corn, if I just shave and get a haircut, I could
probably pass for an eighteen year old (I would just tell them that I forgot my
ID). Boom. There. Done. Now I can watch the movie.
Another thing that you may recall if
you read my previous reviews, is that I dislike children in
movies. I do not find them cute, funny or endearing. If anything,
I find them annoying. Children of the Corn wasn't able to present the
children in a constructive way; they are awkward and it lessens the movie’s overall
impact. I suppose the idea that the children are forming a cult-like group is
creepy in and of itself but it isn't quite enough to do it for me.
The 1980's graphics used to show the
demon didn't age well. Now, don't get me wrong. I get it. This is the early
80's, but the monster looks like a Tron
computer virus! The Exorcist came out a decade earlier and still looks
better.
I read a little about this movie and
there were two versions of the script. The producers decided to go with the one
that had more violence and a more conventional plot. It shows. The story is predictable
and it doesn't create a thrilling sense of urgency. I didn't particularly like the
characters either. Burt is a jerk but he lives and saves everyone. I would have
liked it more, or at least it would have had more of an emotional impact if he and/or
his girlfriend died. They die in the short story, from what I understand.
Overall, I would pass on this movie. I saw it in the early afternoon but I
don't foresee any difficulties sleeping tonight. It wasn't particularly fun to
watch either.
No comments:
Post a Comment