Directed
by Dennis Hopper. Written by Peter Fonda, Dennis Hopper, and Terry
Southern. Starring Peter Fonda (Wyatt), Dennis Hopper (Billy), and
Jack Nicholson (George Hanson).
Bottom line: Easy Rider is a powerful movie that captures the American attitude and spirit in the late 1960's.
3.5/4
The
premise of Easy
Rider
is
rather quite basic; two friends, Wyatt (Fonda) and Billy (Hopper),
ride their motorcycles from LA to Louisiana for Mardi Gras. Their
drug fueled journey becomes a spiritual journey as the pair learns
about themselves and America. The movie opens with the pair of guys
parking cheap motorcycles outside a run down cantina. They are there
to meet a cocaine dealer. The pair sample and approve of the powder.
The camera cuts to the pair waiting near an airport runway. A
Rolls-Royce rolls up and a well dressed man steps out. He, too,
samples and approves of the powder before buying it for a large sum
of money. The pair has made a fortune and plans to spend the
money on a trip to Mardi Gras. They buy new motorcycles and set off
into the desert roads.
The acting in Easy Rider is solid. Dennis Hopper’s performance as Billy is great. Initially, I labeled his character as “hippy”: he has long hair and a bushy mustache and uses “man” as punctuation. At one point the two pick up a hitchhiker who is traveling back to a commune in the middle of the desert. The hitchhiker made me realize that there is a complexity to the characters that I missed. Billy is a hippy-like character in appearance but his temper and focus on worldly pleasures differentiate him from the others. Wyatt is a “cool” or relaxed type of guy and is the one that really grows through the journey. Unlike Billy or George or the hitchhiker, Wyatt is not a representative of a 1960’s demographic. As George (Nicholson) explains, “You are change and people don’t like change.”
As
Easy
Rider is
something of a road trip movie, a common artifact is the super long,
scenery shots. Denisoff and Romanowski note, the music played
during these riding montages, forms a sort of “musical commentary”.
The soundtrack, beginning with “The Pusher” by Steppenwolf,
continues with the iconic “Born to be Wild” also by Steppenwolf.
You can see the progression of the story and tone throughout the rest
of the soundtrack. Easy
Rider is
a perfect example of how music can be utilized to complement the
images on the screen. Sure, we might have a great orchestration that
provides emotional support but, here, the music provides a political
(as well as emotional) support.
Have
you ever watched a movie where a particular scene is burned into your
memory? Maybe it strikes a chord with you but as you see the shot you
know that it is going to stick with you. I'd bet that it usually
happens with scary movies. For example, you're in the shower and the
Psycho
shower
scene flashes through your mind or if you are in a narrow, creepy
hotel hallway, you might imagine The
Shining's
the twins. Easy
Rider
had
one of those moments for me. Wyatt rolls the money they earned by
selling cocaine into a rubber tube. He hides that rubber tube in his
motorcycle's American flag painted, teardrop gas tank. It is a
beautifully succinct yet complex statement about the US. One of the
best parts is that the movie lets the image speak for itself.
The
cutting used at times in the movie is jarring. Instead of a Star
Wars-like swipe cut or a fade to black transition, the movie
alternates between the two scenes. We are watching scene A, then the
movie cuts scene B but after a second cuts back to scene A. The movie
alternates between the two scenes a couple times until resting on
scene B. It is the type of cutting you might expect in an action
movie. A character has a gun and points it at his or her target. The
camera focuses on the gun, then the target, then the gun, 'bang,'
then on the target. This rapid cutting is exciting so we are used to
seeing it in an action but in Easy
Rider
the
transitions between scenes aren't exciting. One jump, for example,
takes us from the pair sitting around a campfire to Wyatt walking
through a dilapidated Church. It felt jarring and don't quite know
how to feel about it. I like the idea of using film techniques in
unconventional ways but it feels awkward. Yeah, I can dig it. The
idea that it is disruptive fits in with the rest of the movie which
is socially disruptive.
My
only major qualm about the movie is that sometimes it moves away from
visual messages to just sitting around a campfire telling us
something. Consider the image of the gas tank and money. I know you
can show some good stuff, movie, keep going; don’t just regress
into telling me something. This isn’t a deal breaker by any means
but it is noteworthy.
If,
for no other reason, to function as a time capsule, I recommend you
see Easy
Rider.
It is clear depiction of a definitive time in American history. It
also illustrates how film can resonate socially and politically. I
think for a discussion post I will think about the responsibility of
art, if there is such a thing. On a superficial level, or if you saw
Easy
Rider without
actually watching it, it might appear like this film is glorifying a
wayward and drug filled lifestyle. From what I hear, that's the
message a majority of the original audience left with. In reality,
Easy
Rider
is criticizing this lifestyle. If people misinterpreted its meaning,
should it have been more overt?
No comments:
Post a Comment